Depuis que la firme californienne a décidé de déclasser certains sites, notamment The New Media Journal, The Java Report, et Michnews, les anti google se sont mis à l’étude.

A noter au passage que ces sites sont encore référencés sur Google Search… Par principe, Google aurait banni de ses news des sites considérés comme non politiquement corrects, mais aurait quand même gardé le bénéfice du nombre élevé de visiteurs.

Ces sites de news censurés ont reçus ce type de justification:

Hi Frank,
Thanks for writing. We received numerous reports about hate content on your site, and after reviewing these reports, decided to remove your site from Google News. We do not allow articles and sources expressly promoting hate speech viewpoints in Google News (although referencing hate speech for commentary and analysis is acceptable).
For example, a number of the complaints we looked at on your site were found to be hate content:

http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/peck/05102006.htm

http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/stock/05082006.htm

http://www.newmediajournal.us/guest/imani/04222006.htm

We hope this helps you understand our position.

Regards,
The Google Team


En représailles, le site du New Media Journal a adopté une stratégie très intelligente. Une attaque indirecte, visant à détourner le sujet de controverse, a été privilégiée, plutôt qu’une action frontale, source de polémique et d’auto-décrédibilisation.

Ces antis Google ont en effet préféré mettre à disposition des internautes une liste quasiment exhaustive de moteurs de recherche (pas moins de 159 moteurs de recherches). La liste est disponible ICI.

Une riposte constructive comme celle-ci se doit d’être saluée, car au-delà de la critique, il est bon de pouvoir proposer d’autres solutions toutes plus originales les unes que les autres (de A9 le moteur d’Amazon, à Zabasearch site qui permet de faire des recherches complètes sur des personnes physiques aux Etats-Unis). Plutôt que d’essayer de nuire à l’image solide du grand moteur de recherche, ils se sont attaché à détourner ses utilisateurs vers d’autres outils, pour nuire à ses parts de marché.

Beaucoup de ces moteurs méritent d’être testé pour leur originalité ou leurs spécificités. Faites-vous plaisir, et donnez-nous vos impressions sur les moteurs que vous aurez préféré !






The antis google are organized…

Several sites unsatisfied with Google treatment decided to counteract. But this response is clever, original, and not unfair, which gives them an unquestionable credit. It also makes it possible to discover several new approaches of the Web, thanks to a multitude of new tools, unquestionable unsuspected…

Since the Californian firm decided to downgrade certain sites, in particular The New Media Newspaper, The Java Report, and Michnews the anti google were studied.

We can underline that these sites are still referred on Google Search… By principle, Google would have banished them from its news sites considered as not politically correct, but would nevertheless have kept the benefit of the high visitors number.

These censured news sites received this type of justification:

Hi Frank,
Thanks for writing. We received numerous reports about hate content on your site, and after reviewing these reports, decided to remove your site from Google News. We do not allow articles and sources expressly promoting hate speech viewpoints in Google News (although referencing hate speech for commentary and analysis is acceptable).
For example, a number of the complaints we looked at on your site were found to be hate content:

http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/peck/05102006.htm
http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/stock/05082006.htm
http://www.newmediajournal.us/guest/imani/04222006.htm

We hope this helps you understand our position.

Regards,
The Google Team


In reprisals, the site of New Media Newspaper adopted a very intelligent strategy. An indirect attack, aiming at diverting the subject of controversy, was privileged, rather than a frontal action, source of polemic.

These antis Google indeed preferred to place at the disposal of the Net surfers an almost exhaustive list of search engines (not less than 159 search engines). A constructive response as this one must be greeted, because beyond criticism, it is wise to be able to propose other more original solutions all the ones than the others (from A9 the Amazon search engine, to Zabasearch a site which makes it possible to make complete research on physical people in the United States). Rather than to try to harm the solid image of the large search engine, they attempted to divert its users towards other tools, to harm its shares of market.

Many of these engines deserve to be tested for their originality or their specificities. Please tell us which are your favorites !